The Triumph of the Right | THE AMERICAN YAWP
We agreed today that these countries will become members of Nato. They are outlined by international relations scholar John Mearsheimer in the leading US establishment journal, Foreign Affairs. That should not be too difficult. In fact, the US stand is far stronger. We need not ask how the United States would have reacted had the countries of Latin America joined the Warsaw Pact, with plans for Mexico and Canada to join as well. As in the case of China, a great deal is at stake, reaching as far — literally — as questions of survival. To be more accurate, re- declared.
- The Reagan Revolution, IV: From Victory to the New World Order.
- An Exit Strategy For Dentists.
- Business Trip (Gay Husbands Book 8).
- What do I write to her?: Real fun tease-messages to get her hooked and responding to you in a flash!
The original GWOT has been quietly removed from history. It very quickly turned into a murderous and destructive terrorist war afflicting Central America, southern Africa, and the Middle East, with grim repercussions to the present, even leading to condemnation of the United States by the World Court which Washington dismissed.
In any event, it is not the right story for history, so it is gone. When the war was declared, the terrorist targets were confined to a small corner of tribal Afghanistan. But such options were off the table.
Instead, the reflexive choice was large-scale violence — not with the goal of overthrowing the Taliban that came later but to make clear US contempt for tentative Taliban offers of the possible extradition of bin Laden. How serious these offers were we do not know, since the possibility of exploring them was never entertained. The US-UK invasion, utterly without credible pretext, is the major crime of the 21st century.
The invasion also generated millions of refugees, largely destroyed the country, and instigated a sectarian conflict that is now tearing apart Iraq and the entire region. Afghanistan has been destroyed beyond the possibility of reliable polling, but there are indications that something similar may be true there as well.
The Reagan Revolution IV: From Victory to the New World Order
Particularly in Iraq the United States suffered a severe defeat, abandoning its official war aims, and leaving the country under the influence of the sole victor, Iran. The sledgehammer was also wielded elsewhere, notably in Libya, where the three traditional imperial powers Britain, France and the US procured security council resolution and instantly violated it, becoming the air force of the rebels.
The effect was to undercut the possibility of a peaceful, negotiated settlement; sharply increase casualties by at least a factor of 10, according to political scientist Alan Kuperman ; leave Libya in ruins, in the hands of warring militias; and, more recently, to provide the Islamic State with a base that it can use to spread terror beyond. A huge flow of weapons and jihadis has spread terror and violence from west Africa now the champion for terrorist murders to the Levant, while the Nato attack also sent a flood of refugees from Africa to Europe. This piece was first published on TomDispatch.
The second superpower The neoliberal programs of the past generation have concentrated wealth and power in far fewer hands while undermining functioning democracy, but they have aroused opposition as well, most prominently in Latin America but also in the centers of global power. Facebook Twitter Pinterest.
Topics US foreign policy. Reuse this content. Order by newest oldest recommendations.egehagbran.tk
29. The Triumph of the Right
Show 25 25 50 All. Threads collapsed expanded unthreaded. But there was a lot of concern. Despite the chaos in the Trump administration, US officials have set about pushing through a series of longstanding conservative priorities, such as tax cuts and the appointment of Supreme Court justices. Roger Noriega, a former US ambassador and assistant secretary of state who is now a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute AEI , said the same approach is taking shape in foreign policy. Even within the FDD, though, there is some lingering concern. During a recent visit to Washington, Schweizer, the author of Victory , who lives in Florida, said he was surprised to hear that his old book had received so much attention on the subject of Iran.
While he has paid only casual attention to the debate over Iran policy in Washington, he said, he did notice some echoes of the Reagan era. It could also require the US to look on as the Iranian regime cracked down on the opposition with ferocious violence.
During the Cold War, Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev first opened the door for democracy movements by allowing space for reform. Then, when pushed to the brink, he ultimately decided to step down rather than order the massacre of his opponents. US programs to support Iranian civil society and opposition groups were ongoing even under Obama, including efforts to help Iranians keep unfettered access to the internet through tools such as virtual private networks and encryption technology.
These programs have become more concerted against the regime under Trump, said Mariam Memarsadeghi, an Iranian American who runs Tavaana, a State Department—funded program to promote civil society in Iran. She said that the Trump administration is more in tune with groups like hers that oppose the regime — and that concerns of what might happen if the regime were to collapse are misplaced.
What New World Order?
Yes, there are. The source noted that there are ways the US government could seek to exploit democracy promotion programs: helping to fund and organize demonstrations and boycotts, for example, or running social media campaigns intended to promote regime change. Left: Trump shows the document signed to reinstate sanctions against Iran, May 8, Right: Protests of the sanctions in Tehran, May 9, Having worked with Pompeo during his time as CIA director, he said that while Pompeo espouses a tougher stance on Iran, he also takes the long view.
His goal at the agency was to make the organization more responsive and robust, and he shows every sign of doing the same at State. Gerecht and a co-author recently published an essay in the Weekly Standard calling on Trump and his foreign policy team to aggressively pursue a regime change strategy in Iran.
It ought to be clear to Trump and his administration that regime change is the only pragmatic course open to them unless they are prepared to accept a nuclear-armed Iran. There are those in the administration who are nervous about it. He added that one thing that could keep a lid on escalation between the US and Iran could be the Iranian regime itself, if it decides to wait out what it hopes will be a short-lived Trump administration, with the idea of dealing instead with its successor.
With that in mind, he suspected that Iranian leadership would be paying close attention to the political headwinds in the US midterm elections coming in November. Contact Mike Giglio at mike. Further reading Questions Italy the first appearance of Fascism Why was Mussolini able to come to power? What did the term 'fascism' stand for? Mussolini introduces the fascist state What benefits did fascism bring for the Italian people? Opposition and downfall Further reading Questions What did National Socialism stand for?
Hitler consolidates his power How was Hitler able to stay in power? Nazism and Fascism How successful was Hitler in domestic affairs? Russia and the revolutions, After were the revolutions inevitable? The two revolutions: March and November How successfully did Lenin and the Bolsheviks deal with their problems —24? Lenin - evil genius? Further reading Questions.
Related The Reagan Revolution, IV: From Victory to the New World Order
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved